|
[Available at http://capitaldefenseweeekly.com/archives/080107.htm]
If you have haven't
guessed, thanks to the traditional early January slowdown, there
isn't much new case law to report in this edition.
Baze oral arguments dominates this issue. The oral
argument transcript reveals that all the Justices appear to support
the concept that the Eighth Amendment does apply to the procedures of
how a person is executed. The Justices appear split, however, on
whether the record is adequate to address the ultimate issues and
whether the Court should remand for further factual developments.
The ultimate question, is perhaps best summed up by Reason magazine’s
Jacob Sullum, Which
Execution Method Causes the Least Discomfort (to the Public)?
The Supreme Court in Wright v. Van Patten reverses a grant of habeas
corpus relief in a noncapital case in this per curiam opinion.
Previously the Seventh Circuit held that trial counsel's appearance
merely by phone resulted in ineffective assistance of counsel.
The Warden sought cert and the Supreme Court summarily granted
certiorari, vacated, and remanded (GVR'd) in light of Carey v. Musladin. On remand
the Seventh Circuit reinstated habeas relief holding nothing in Musladin prevented the grant of
relief. This time, rather than GVR'ng the case, the Supreme Court
details why habeas relief was inappropriate.
The Supreme Court on Monday also granted Maxwell
Hoffman’s Motion
to Vacate Decision Below and Dismiss the Cause as Moot in Hoffman v. Arave. Hoffman received
habeas relief on both guilt and penalty phase related claims, including
ineffective assistance of counsel as it related failing to pursue a
proposed plea agreement that would have taken death of the table.
The State appealed only the guilt phase grants of relief to the Ninth
Circuit and, following that, certiorari on the IAC issues as it related
to the plea bargaining issues. The vacateur of of the cert. means,
practically, Hoffman's resentencing trial can begin in Idaho.
In the political news of the week, John
Spirko was commuted by Governor Strickland in Ohio after DNA
failed to link him to the crime for which he was scheduled to die in a
few weeks. Nebraska appears to be more and more
looking like
it will be having another show down vote on repealing the death penalty
in
2008, it will either pass or fail in the legislature by the thinnest of
margins. Internationally, Morocco’s government appears
to have renounced the death penalty in principle becoming, quite
possibly, the first Arab country to abandon the practice. Indeed,
“Justice Minister Abdelwahed Radi said Morocco no longer views the
death penalty as acceptable.”
In other news, in Ohio Kenny
Richey has been freed. after two decades on death row following a
time served nolo contendre plea. DPIC
notes In
The Top Ten Death Penalty Myths, professors Rudolph J. Gerber and John
M. Johnson explore ten arguments used to support the death penalty and
provide readers with current research and studies on how
"political and community leaders have
used myth and emotional appeals to misrepresent the facts about capital
executions.” A curious legal challenge in New Mexico, according
to this press report, looks to have a decent shot at ending the
death penalty there.
In the realm of professional development, Alison
J. Nathan & Douglas
A. Berman, have a must read piece at SSRN entitle Debate,
Baze-d and Confused: What’s the Deal with Lethal Injection?, 156 U.
Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra (forthcoming Jan. 2008). Fordham’s Urban Law
Journal has announced it will hold a symposium
entitled “THE LETHAL
INJECTION DEBATE: LAW AND SCIENCE” with Judge Jeremy Fogel of the
Northern District of
California as its Keynote
Speaker for late winter. A reminder, that the Habeas
College will be held February 6-8, 2008 in San Antonio, TX focusing on
the nuts and bolts of postconviction litigation with discussions of
individual cases. Additional CLEs are discussed at CapDefNet's
calendar page.
Looking ahead, three opinions of note are noted so far.
In Richard Harper
v. State, a pretrial appeal, the fruits of a search of Harper's
office are suppressed as "the warrant authorizing the search was issued
without
a showing of probable cause" and no exception to the warrant
requirement can be found. In Florida the state supreme court in Ronald
Lee Williams v. State grants relief as " trial counsel was
ineffective
in failing to present the trial court with available evidence of
mitigation"especially in light of the trial judge's reputation for
overriding to death jury recommendations for life.
Finally, there is the Sixth Circuit's holding in Frank
Spisak v. Hudson,
on remand from the SCOTUS that "[a]fter careful review and
consideration
of Musladin and Landrigan, we find that neither of the cases require
reversal" of the prior grant of penalty phase relief.
As we've been warning for some time, we've modified the names
& email group address, but as always, thank you for reading. -k
Week of January 7, 2008 – In Favor
of the
Accused or Condemned
- Richard
Harper v. State, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 19 (GA 1/8/2008) "[A] warrant
was required for the search of Harper's desk
at work, because the warrant authorizing the search was issued without
a showing of probable cause, because no exception to the warrant
requirement has been shown, and because Georgia does not have a good
faith exception to the search warrant requirement, the fruits of the
search of the desk must be suppressed. "
- Ronald
Lee Williams v. State, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 5 & 2008 Fla. LEXIS 48
(FL 1/10/2008) "[W]e
reverse the trial court's denial of
relief on appellant's claim that trial counsel was ineffective
in failing to present the trial court with available evidence of
mitigation." Specifically, where the jury recommends life
but the trial judge has a reputation for judicial override to death
counsel has a duty to put on the best mitigation case they can to save
their client's life and not to hold anything back.
- Frank
Spisak v. Hudson,
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 495 (6th Cir. 1/11/2008) A panel granted penalty
phase relief. The Warden sought cert. from the SCOTUS. The
SCOTUS
remands in light of Musladin and Landrigan. After careful review and
consideration
of Musladin and Landrigan, we find that neither of the cases require
reversal of our prior disposition of this case. Accordingly, we
reinstate our opinion of October 20, 2006, partially granting habeas
relief and ordering a new mitigation phase trial."
Week of January 7, 2008 – In
Favor of the State or Government
- Kenneth
Earl Gay v. Ayers,
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 379 (9th Cir 1/7/2008) A nineteen-month
period of
delay by the California Supreme Court in does not weigh toward finding
an exception to the general rules governing exhaustion.
(Initial List for
the Week of January 14, 2008
) – In Favor
of the
Accused or Condemned
- Richard
Harper v. State, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 19 (GA 1/8/2008) "[A] warrant
was required for the search of Harper's desk
at work, because the warrant authorizing the search was issued without
a showing of probable cause, because no exception to the warrant
requirement has been shown, and because Georgia does not have a good
faith exception to the search warrant requirement, the fruits of the
search of the desk must be suppressed. "
- Ronald
Lee Williams v. State, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 5 & 2008 Fla. LEXIS 48
(FL 1/10/2008) "[W]e
reverse the trial court's denial of
relief on appellant's claim that trial counsel was ineffective
in failing to present the trial court with available evidence of
mitigation." Specifically, where the jury recommends life
but the trial judge has a reputation for judicial override to death
counsel has a duty to put on the best mitigation case they can to save
their client's life and not to hold anything back.
- Frank
Spisak v. Hudson,
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 495 (6th Cir. 1/11/2008) A panel granted penalty
phase relief. The Warden sought cert. from the SCOTUS. The
SCOTUS
remands in light of Musladin and Landrigan. After careful review and
consideration
of Musladin and Landrigan, we find that neither of the cases require
reversal of our prior disposition of this case. Accordingly, we
reinstate our opinion of October 20, 2006, partially granting habeas
relief and ordering a new mitigation phase trial."
(Initial List for
the Week of January 7, 2008
) – In
Favor of the State or Government
- Kenneth
Earl Gay v. Ayers,
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 379 (9th Cir 1/7/2008) A nineteen-month
period of
delay by the California Supreme Court in does not weigh toward finding
an exception to the general rules governing exhaustion.
SMALL
PRINT
SUBSCRIBING & ARCHIVES:
The summaries above are normally written by Karl Keys and
published forty (40) times (or so) a year.
1997-2008
COPYRIGHT / DISCLAIMER / FAIR USE
NOTICE: In plain English, you can use these materials without
attribution (although I would appreciate the attribution) for any
noncommercial purposes you see fit, (such as
professional education, your newsletter, etc.). You can't use the
works created
by others contained in this newsletter identified above (normally
selected excerpts from the works of others) as I simply can't give away
the rights of others to
their intellectual property. Any derivative works must provide at least
as equal or
greater waiver of intellectual property rights. Nothing
in this newsletter constitutes legal advice.
The legalese,
copyright, disclaimers, notices, & terms of usage are available in
full here.
Where in conflict
with the plain English version of this disclaimer / copyright notice,
please go with the legalese
ADDITIONAL DISCLAIMER:
In plain English, due your own due diligence. Legalese: Use does not
constitute establishment of attorney-client relationship. On a
semi-regular basis cases in which the writer(s) have participated in
one manner
or another (including as counsel of record) may be covered here. As
always, the views expressed here represent an attempt to show what a
given Court held, not whether a particular court reached the right
decision The opinions noted above are normally "slip
opinions" that may be modified or withdrawn by the issuing court
without notice. Note the citation method we use is to permit readers to
readily find opinions either from a given court, Lexis, or the free
Lexis product Lexisone.com.
*Execution information
derived from Rick Halperin, DPIC & media accounts
**Week at a Glance is the work of the
Habeas Assistant & Training Project & Wendy Peoples.
|